Rep. Clay Higgins Launches Conspiracy Attack on Hakeem Jeffries

Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) stirred controversy on social media on March 11, 2024, by making a conspiratorial accusation against House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY). Higgins posted a photo of Jeffries on the platform X, previously known as Twitter, and referred to him as a “reptilian.” This remark echoes conspiracy theories propagated by figures such as British conspiracy theorist David Icke, who claims that shape-shifting reptilian humanoids occupy key positions in global governments.

The post gained significant attention, with many users expressing disbelief and condemnation. Critics were quick to respond, with one user, known as “Chippy Dizzle,” stating, “You SHOULD lose your job for this… but as we’ve learned, there are no consequences for Republicans anymore.” This comment reflects a growing sentiment among some groups that there is a lack of accountability for lawmakers’ statements and actions.

Higgins has long been an ally of former President Donald Trump, supporting efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 election and frequently using Trump’s rhetoric in his political discourse. In fact, Trump endorsed Higgins for re-election in 2024, calling him an “America First warrior” during a recorded phone call that Higgins has prominently featured in his campaign materials.

The accusation of being a “reptilian” reportedly shocked even some who typically align with Higgins politically. User “Jessica,” who is noted to have connections with Trump ally Rep. Mike Lee and has a substantial following on X, remarked, “Weird times we are in.” This sentiment highlights the growing concern among political observers that certain rhetoric is pushing boundaries, even within partisan lines.

As the political climate intensifies leading up to the 2024 elections, Higgins’s remarks may further inflame existing divisions. Critics argue that such conspiracy-laden accusations undermine the integrity of political discourse and distract from the pressing issues facing constituents.

The incident raises questions about the state of political dialogue in the United States and the broader implications for democratic accountability. As the country approaches the next election cycle, the discourse among lawmakers may increasingly reflect the polarized climate that has characterized recent years.