Meghan Markle has ignited fresh controversy over her ongoing use of her royal title during private interviews, raising questions about her connection to the British royal family. The Duchess of Sussex reportedly insisted on being formally addressed as “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” during a recent interview for the Harper’s Bazaar, according to a report by Fox News. This instance, among others, has drawn criticism from royal commentators who argue that such behavior demonstrates her desire to maintain her royal identity.
During the interview in a Manhattan brownstone, reporter Kaitlyn Greenidge expressed surprise when a staff member introduced Markle in such a manner, especially since only the two of them were present. A similar introduction occurred in Los Angeles, further highlighting her preference for royal acknowledgment. Helena Chard, a British broadcaster, stated, “This is not protocol, let alone royal protocol,” emphasizing that Markle seems to attach significant importance to her title, which she argues continues to enhance her public profile.
Commentators have noted that Markle’s actions are likely strategic, as they serve her business interests, particularly in the United States. Hilary Fordwich, a royal expert, described the introductions as “very intentional” and criticized Markle for what she perceived as hypocrisy in her approach. The interview featured several carefully staged moments, including a cappuccino with Markle’s face in the foam, which she recognized from a past trip.
The question of Markle’s title usage has been a recurrent theme, particularly since her marriage to Prince Harry in 2018. The couple stepped back from royal duties in 2020 and has since openly discussed their challenges in various media platforms. Although they retain their titles, they agreed not to use the styling of “HRH” nor to engage in commercial activities under the “Sussex Royal” branding. Yet, royal observers suggest that Markle is testing the limits of these agreements.
Earlier this year, Markle sent a gift basket to entrepreneur Jamie Kern Lima with a note signed “HRH Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.” Her team defended this as a private gesture, but critics argued it crossed a line due to the commercial nature of the products included. Kinsey Schofield, host of “Kinsey Schofield Unfiltered,” commented that Markle is “walking a fine line by flaunting her title commercially,” especially as she promotes her lifestyle brand, As Ever.
Concerns surrounding the couple’s continued association with their royal titles were amplified when they rejected the royal family’s proposal for a “half-in, half-out” arrangement. Commentators warn that any perception of “cash for access” could damage the monarchy’s reputation. As Richard Fitzwilliams noted, while using her title is acceptable in certain formal settings, it becomes problematic in private contexts, such as interviews.
Experts predict that this will not be the last time Markle’s use of her title becomes a topic of discussion. Chard remarked on Markle’s affinity for “pomp, sparkle, and drama,” suggesting that while visibility may be her forte, it could jeopardize her personal brand. As the dialogue surrounding her royal status continues, the implications for her public image and business ventures remain to be seen.
