A recent bill passed by the New Mexico House of Representatives has ignited a fierce debate regarding immigration and job security in the state. House Bill 9, which prohibits local governments from contracting with the federal government to detain undocumented immigrants and others with pending immigration cases, was approved on Friday, March 1, 2024. The bill now moves to the Senate for further consideration.
Republican Senator Jim Townsend expressed his dismay over the passage of the bill, stating he felt “sick to his stomach” watching representatives potentially jeopardize jobs for their constituents. In a Facebook post on Saturday, March 2, Townsend asserted that the legislation would “purposely kill” approximately 1,000 jobs in New Mexico. He accused the Democratic majority in the Legislature of prioritizing political animosity towards former President Donald Trump over the welfare of New Mexicans.
The vote on House Bill 9 largely followed party lines, with only three Democrats joining the Republicans in opposition. Townsend revealed that he had spoken with a Democratic representative who felt compelled to support the bill due to recent events in Minneapolis, indicating the political pressures at play. He characterized the situation as “shameful” and “absolutely disgusting,” suggesting that New Mexicans are being punished for political reasons.
In an effort to challenge the bill, Townsend reached out to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, seeking federal assistance to block its implementation. As the 30-day legislative session progresses, tensions are expected to escalate further.
The Senate is set to address Senate Bill 18, known as the Clear Horizons Act, which aims to codify New Mexico’s emission reduction targets. This hearing will take place in the Senate chambers due to the anticipated high turnout of supporters and opponents. Proponents of the bill argue it represents a diverse coalition advocating for families to have stability, clean air, and a reliable future.
Opposition to the Clear Horizons Act is being spearheaded by the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association (NMOGA), which has been actively campaigning against the proposal. Their messaging includes advertisements urging citizens to contact their lawmakers, warning that the bill will negatively impact living costs across the state. One advertisement features Sen. Liz Stefanics, the chair of the Senate Conservation Committee, stating, “Tell Senator Stefanics not to raise your cost of living.”
As the legislative session continues, the outcomes of both House Bill 9 and Senate Bill 18 are poised to impact New Mexico’s economic landscape and the broader political climate within the state. The discussion surrounding these bills underscores the complex interplay between immigration policy, job security, and environmental regulations.
