Washington Legislators Propose New Laws to Regulate AI Technology

Lawmakers in Washington State have introduced new legislation aimed at regulating the growing influence of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly in the realm of companion chatbots. Senate Bill 5984, titled “Concerning regulation of artificial intelligence companion chatbots,” was presented in Olympia this past week and seeks to address the complex relationship between humans and AI.

The bill’s sponsor, state Senator Sharon Shewmake from Bellingham, highlighted concerns surrounding emotional attachments to chatbots, stating that the legislation stems from instances where individuals develop deep connections with AI, akin to those depicted in science fiction films such as “I, Robot” and “Her.” “This comes out of stories about people falling in love with their chatbot,” Shewmake explained.

The proposed legislation includes specific requirements for chatbots to disclose their identity at regular intervals, mandating that they announce, “I am not human” or “I am not a real person” every three hours. This measure aims to prevent misunderstandings and potential emotional harm, particularly among vulnerable users. Shewmake expressed her astonishment at the current state of affairs, noting, “I cannot believe I just wrote that sentence,” emphasizing the surreal nature of addressing such issues in contemporary society.

Addressing Broader AI Concerns

The introduction of Senate Bill 5984 reflects a broader struggle among lawmakers to manage the rapid integration of AI in various sectors. This legislative session has seen over 500 bills filed, many of which grapple with the implications of AI on everyday life. These include regulations on AI’s role in hiring and firing processes, medical assistance, and even setting rental prices. Shewmake’s reference to a bill dubbed “No robo bosses” illustrates the growing apprehension regarding AI’s increasing authority in decision-making roles.

Concerns have also been raised about the potential consequences of AI in educational settings. One proposal aims to ensure that no student faces punishment from an “automated decision system” without human oversight, advocating for the importance of context in disciplinary actions. This highlights a common sentiment among legislators: a desire to maintain human involvement in decisions that profoundly affect people’s lives.

Shewmake noted that many lawmakers feel overwhelmed by the pace of technological advancement, stating, “I do not think anyone really knows what to do here.” The sense of urgency is palpable as legislators attempt to navigate the complexities of a rapidly evolving digital landscape.

Legislative Challenges and Cultural Reflections

Beyond AI, Washington State lawmakers are also addressing various other technological advancements, including the regulation of 3D-printed firearms. A proposed bill seeks to mandate that these printers contain intelligent software capable of detecting and blocking gun blueprints, showcasing the multifaceted nature of current legislative efforts.

The legislative landscape also reflects broader cultural anxieties, with a recent focus on conspiracy theories surrounding weather modification. A bill requiring airports to report any weather-modifying aircraft attempts to confront public fears associated with such phenomena. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has previously issued statements clarifying that there is no evidence supporting claims of weather control, yet these concerns remain influential in legislative discussions.

Legislators are also preparing to counteract the influence of the previous administration, with efforts aimed at safeguarding the state’s voter database and preventing the establishment of secret police. The recurring theme of “forces beyond our control” resonates throughout this legislative session, as lawmakers grapple with issues that feel increasingly overwhelming and surreal.

As Washington State navigates these pressing issues, the need for a comprehensive approach to technology regulation remains clear. The ongoing discussions reveal a collective urgency to ensure that human agency is preserved amidst the rapid rise of AI and other technological innovations.